Take the GATE BIOTECH MARKS SURVEY. An attempt to estimate the cut-off    
  • Welcome to Biotechnology Forums!
  • Contribution is the key to connections! Stay active and you'll benefit a lot!
  • Defeat the Difficulties!
Hello There, Guest! Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blood-based cancer diagnosis: promising new strategy
This is post no. 1 under the main topic.
A new strategy for improved cancer detection via blood-based diagnosis has been described in a recent study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The study comes from a team of researchers based in Stanford University and in National Yang-Ming University in Taiwan.

Early cancer detection can lead to dramatically improved effectiveness of treatment strategies. Blood-based diagnosis would be a major advantage in this regard, but despite intensive research efforts over decades, many apparently promising blood biomarkers have failed clinically. Problems such as variability of cancer biomarker expression by non-malignant cells and heterogeneity among tumours have proved to be frustratingly intractable.

In the current study, the research team attempted to overcome these issues by artificially engineering the tumour cells to express a reporter which is not normally expressed in any tissue. The researchers used nonviral safe vectors called “tumor-activatable minicircles”. These used the pan-tumour–specific survivin promoter to drive expression of a secretable reporter. The minicircles were systemically administered to mice that were expressing human melanoma metastases and also to tumour-free mice. The results indicated that by measuring blood reporter levels, tumour-bearing mice could be reliably distinguished from tumour-free mice for up to two weeks. Furthermore, tumour burden in the lungs correlated with cumulative reporter levels, indicating that the extent of disease progression could also be determined. 
The study authors suggested that their test could first be used in patients with a high risk for tumour recurrence, then for diagnostic screening of high-risk populations and, if proven safe and effective, for the general population. They concluded: “Our system represents an alternative paradigm for improved cancer detection and could enable more timely interventions to combat this devastating disease.”

Reference: Ronald JA, Chuang H-Y, Dragulescu-Andrasi A, Hori SS, Gambhir SS. Detecting cancers through tumor-activatable minicircles that lead to a detectable blood biomarker. PNAS (2015) doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414156112
This is post no. 2 under the main topic.
Now I've heard from a teacher of mine, a biology teacher, and some of my fellow students that they're starting to come up with the idea of using tiiiiny nano machines, the size of cells possibly if they can get them that small, that will enter the body and get rid of cancerous tumors..
OR possibly doing what you just reported, but with the act of genetically modifying the tumor to introduce cell death, with the help of a modified bacteria that could enter the cancer cells and force cell death upon it.. theyre just having a hard time figuring out how to do this and NOT kill off other similar cells in the process. This is a great progress report! Thanks for the share!

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  CRISPR cuts HIV: potential preventive and therapeutic strategy mtwalsh01 1 2,534 04-16-2015, 05:23 PM
Last Post: Noah56
  BCL11A: a novel overactive triple-negative breast cancer gene mtwalsh01 0 2,137 01-10-2015, 12:41 AM
Last Post: mtwalsh01
  Bacterial input to wound-associated skin cancer mtwalsh01 0 1,703 01-10-2015, 12:11 AM
Last Post: mtwalsh01
  Biomarker for therapy resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer mtwalsh01 0 2,263 06-12-2014, 06:12 PM
Last Post: mtwalsh01
  MM-398 shows promise in phase 3 trial for pancreatic cancer mtwalsh01 0 2,060 06-06-2014, 09:25 PM
Last Post: mtwalsh01

Browsing: 1 Guest(s)