• Welcome to Biotechnology Forums!
  • Contribution is the key to connections! Stay active and you'll benefit a lot!
  • Defeat the Difficulties!
Hello There, Guest! Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
U.S. brain drain of young scientific talent needs to be stemmed
This is post no. 1 under the main topic.
A ‘brain drain’ of young talent is threatening the future of scientific research in the U.S. That’s according to a new article by Johns Hopkins University President Ronald J. Daniels, published this week in the online Early Edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The article shows that grants for young scientists in the U.S. have been declining for more than a generation.

One striking figure highlighted in the article shows that the percentage of principal investigators with a leading National Institutes of Health grant aged 36 years old or younger fell from 18 % in 1983 to only 3 % in 2010. The average age for a scientist with a medical degree to obtain their first of these grants has risen from less than 38 years old in 1980 to over 45 in 2013. Prof Daniels points out the implications of these facts for younger scientists in the article: "Without their own funding, young researchers are prevented from starting their own laboratories, pursuing their own research, and advancing their own careers in academic science. It is not surprising that many of our youngest minds are choosing to leave their positions."

Prof Daniels goes on to point out that if the exodus of young researchers from academia continues, it will have implications including gradual evaporation of new discoveries, loss of future leaders and mentors, reduced diversity in the workforce and the loss of scientists just as they reach what should be a pivotal point in their career. The article identifies the three main reasons behind the reduction in research funding for younger researchers as longer training periods, a grant system that may favour incumbents and increases in cost of research to universities, which may result in them sticking with established researchers rather than taking a chance on younger candidates with no established funding stream.

In the article, Prof Daniels suggests policy reforms to address the position of young scientists. These include more robust funding of the NIH, with more money set aside for new talent, and refining of the peer review process to better accommodate inexperienced scientists and more daring proposals. He also suggests that a standing body should be established to review the issue on an ongoing basis and assess effectiveness of any interventions, as well as to drive stakeholders such as the NIH, Congress and the universities to take effective action.

Prof Daniels says that the U.S. can learn from other countries: "The inability to staunch -- if not reverse -- the above trends stands as an urgent and compelling policy challenge. The current stewards of the U.S. research enterprise bear a responsibility to sustain and safeguard that enterprise so that it can provide a platform for the scientists and the science of generations to come…Other countries are marshalling the will and resources to invest in the next generation of young scientists. A comparable solution in the United States will require a comparable commitment on the part of all actors in the biomedical science ecosystem. ... Our next generation of scientists, and indeed our next generation of science, demands nothing less."

Reference: Daniels RJ. A generation at risk: Young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce. PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418761112

Press release: Johns Hopkins University; available at http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-01/jhu-sar010715.php
This is post no. 2 under the main topic.
I hope this rises as the industry of Biotechnology blooms more. I am planning on becoming a scientist and I am not even close to 30 yet and I am in school for it, a year by now. Its sad the people in my classes are not even going for science careers but nursing. I'm one of three people in the entire biology class branches that is headed for science. I hope this fixes! I'd hate to get there only to find out that it's been canceled because labs have gone 'out of business' if you get what I mean.. I say encourage higher learning to children who are younger, let them go to labs and see things for themselves.. maybe we can gather a crowd of aspired children, like I was! lol..

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Cocoa flavanols are good for your brain mtwalsh01 1 1,479 01-06-2017, 06:20 AM
Last Post: Brii1920
  Gene shuffling deals dangerous genetic outcome in childhood brain tumour mtwalsh01 0 2,445 06-23-2014, 04:42 PM
Last Post: mtwalsh01
  It’s official: scientific research is economically worthwhile mtwalsh01 0 2,778 04-06-2014, 10:26 PM
Last Post: mtwalsh01
  A brain region that helps us limit alcohol consumption mtwalsh01 0 1,559 04-03-2014, 07:34 PM
Last Post: mtwalsh01
  EU concerns on potential neonicotinoid pesticide effects on brain development mtwalsh01 0 2,526 12-19-2013, 06:39 PM
Last Post: mtwalsh01

Browsing: 1 Guest(s)